Muslim Obama’s brothers attempt to bomb America

January 7th, 2010

The runway to Flight 253

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

5 January 2009: Next to overt acts of terrorism, intimidation is a most powerful weapon in the arsenal of Islamic terrorists in their war against the U.S. and the West. Acquiescence to intimidation is celebrated by our enemies as much as images of planes striking U.S. buildings. Although it lacks the same level of visual impact, it cuts as deep within the fabric of our security and way of life. It is a tactic that is currently being used adeptly against ordinary citizens, businesses, law enforcement, politicians, and even our judiciary by Islamists intent on imposing their agenda on the West. Their objective is to dominate and ultimately eliminate our Western society from within. Their stealth tactic is intimidation.

Witness, for example, the results of the Christmas Day bombing attempt on Delta-Northwest Fight 253 by a Muslim terrorist. The response by the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), a component of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under the current leadership of Janet Napolitano, was to impose a series of new restrictive security procedures aboard aircraft already filled with passengers and flying at 35,000 feet, instead of addressing the threat at a more reasonable elevation, such as at ground level.

To believe that restricting lavatory use and keeping blankets off the laps of grandmothers will make air travel safer is to believe in a myth that should be insulting to every law abiding air passenger. All passengers are not the problem, and not all passengers pose a threat to air travel. To make air travel safer, we must identify potential threats before they board an aircraft. To do so, we must first break free from the bonds of political correctness and admit, without feelings of guilt or reservation that the threat is originating from Islamic terrorists and those who facilitate them.

We must immediately implement an aggressive program of comprehensive profiling that takes into account religion, ethnicity, country of origin, citizenship and countries recently traveled. We must also factor in other conditions including but not limited to methods and times of ticket purchases, luggage and carry-on conditions, connections and destinations, and traveling companions.

Most importantly, we must immediately employ and effectively utilize well trained and seasoned behavioral profilers at every commercial airport terminal to identify potential high-risk passengers. Additionally, properly trained plain clothes security personnel, asking strategic, probative questions of passengers, working strategically within the throngs of traveling public inside the air terminal must work in tandem with each other and with those manning the security check points. Further, those who man the checkpoints must be well trained and must know exactly what to look for as well.

I would argue that not only would the system be exponentially more effective than the current “Napolitano Doctrine of exposed laps and hold it until you land,” it is far less invasive than full body scans that might allow prying eyes a look at a passenger usually reserved for spouses or family doctors. Truth be told, the former would be less offensive to a bona fide peaceful Muslim than having his wife’s body exposed to a stranger seated behind a machine. Why then, is there such resistance to the implementation of such a comprehensive security process?

Leading the charge of objections to such profiling is the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and CAIR Canada, which has condemned such profiling techniques as discriminatory to Muslims. Doesn’t anyone find it duplicitous that the same organization that has demanded the right for female Muslims to wear head coverings for photographic identification at the DMV has no problem with a full body scan at an airport?

Also, in the event people have forgotten, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) was named as one of about 300 unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development trial. On November 24, 2008, the government secured guilty verdicts against the Holy Land Foundation and five individual defendants, finding that the organization was guilty of funneling over $12 million to the terrorist group HAMAS, a US designated terrorist organization.

Does anyone find it odd that publicly, CAIR “condemns” acts of potential terrorism such as what took place aboard flight 253, yet filed a lawsuit against our own government over a program implemented to monitor terrorist communications that could have facilitated the discovery of the Christmas Day threat, and further demanded TSA and other security personnel to undergo “sensitivity training” to avoid offending the cultural and religious sensitivities of Muslims going through airport security?

Lest anyone think I am singling out CAIR as the only Islamic advocacy group with at ties to Islamic terrorists, the TSA also invited the Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) to provide sensitivity training” to TSA officials and screeners. An August 28, 2007 press release by the ADC Michigan Chapter proudly announced that they “conducted a sensitivity training session with a group of first tier airport security managers of the Transportation and Security Administration (TSA) at Detroit Metro Airport.” In that press release, Senior National Advisor and Regional Director Imad HAMAD is identified as one of the presenters. The importance of this cannot be understated; HAMAD was a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist organization that is responsible for airplane hijackings and homicide bombings. Dr. Daniel Pipes, a noted scholar and authority on Islamist matters, provides important insight on HAMAD and the ADC at this link. It is required reading.

Less than two weeks before the near fatal bombing of Christmas Day, I warned about Islamist attacks on our airline industry, citing the actions of two Muslims aboard an American West flight from Phoenix to Washington, DC. In that case, CAIR immediately came to the aid of the two Muslim “victims” of profiling. Well, that flight was in 1999, and the two “victims” were actually al Qaeda recruits from Saudi Arabia who had received explosives training in Afghanistan. The discrimination suit was dismissed and in 2003, and the two victims, Muhammed al-Qudhaieen and Hamdan al-Shalawi were eventually deported. Despite the dismissal, there was the cumbersome issue of defending against the seemingly predatory legal action.

While portraying themselves as patriotic and sympathetic to air security, CAIR has not only encouraged, but have facilitated lawsuits against airlines, law enforcement officials, and even passengers who have the presence of mind to report suspicious behavior of Muslims at an airport and aboard an aircraft. I am referring to the case of the six Muslim Imams aboard USAir Flight 300 on November 20, 2006.

As I accurately predicted and was quoted in The Washington Times article on November 21, 2006, I stated that the USAir Flight 300 event of alleged discrimination would be “…a watershed event in this country…and they are looking for this to be litigated ad nauseam.” And it was, and continues to be a near gold-standard of litigation against airline security by Islamic travelers.

In the months following that event aboard USAir Flight 300, CAIR was at the forefront to change, through threats of litigation and ultimate litigation, airport security as it applies to Muslim travelers. And it worked. Witness the birth of the Flying While Muslim website, where Muslim passengers are well advised of their rights while traveling by air.

It would seem that the runway to the events aboard Delta-Northwest Flight 253, despite that flight originating in a foreign country, has been paved by a combination of events, including the tireless efforts of CAIR, the ADC, and their respective representatives and every government agent and politician who permits such groups access to airport security policies – or worse – permits such groups and their representatives to actually influence them.

Any person of reasonable sensibilities should be asking why our current and former administrations have invited and permitted individuals and organizations with either direct or tangential ties to Islamic terrorist groups access to airport security. One answer, particularly with respect to politicians, is of course, monetary contributions to their various political campaigns. Another less palatable answer, particularly with regard to the influence shaping the policies of airlines, security groups and other support services, is the threat of litigation.

When such “influence” manifests itself in the form of the threat of litigation, it is, in my opinion, nothing less than intimidation. Any security policy that is shaped from such threats is not only ineffectual and dangerous to the flying public, but an invitation to certain disaster. At present, our air security apparatus is being held hostage while we continue to implement security measures that are nothing more than window dressing, much like the current “Napolitano Doctrine” of airline lavatory use. Historically and absent of facing down those who intimidate, hostage situations don’t end well. Mark my words, the threat posed to air travelers has exponentially increased over the last few years and will not end well in the near term.

As detailed above, the runway to Flight 253 has been well paved. The runway to the next event, most likely one that will have a much more disastrous outcome, continues to be upgraded by intimidation tactics and acquiescence.

Tags:
Posted in photos | No Comments »

“Dry Run” by Obama’s muslim scum brothers; an attempt disrupt airline system(s)

December 5th, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

Security incident aboard AirTran Flight 297 suggests terror “Dry Run”
Posted By Director On December 3, 2009 @ 8:02 am In Domestic Terrorism, Editorials, Sean Osborne | Comments Disabled

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

3 December 2009: On November 17, an incident took place aboard AirTran Flight 297 scheduled to fly from Atlanta Hartsfield Airport to Houston that the media does not want to cover and everyone from the airline to the TSA and other government agencies want to keep very quiet. The reasons, I have been told, is fear of predatory lawsuits, negative publicity from accusations of religious profiling, and the obligatory subjugation to mindless mandatory Muslim sensitivity training that make a mockery of our American system of values. Interestingly, one airline official told me “we don’t want to become another flight 300,” which is a reference to a very similar scenario that took place aboard US Airways Flight 300 exactly three years ago.
I was first contacted about this incident two days after it happened by a passenger who was aboard AirTran Flight 297. Based on the allegations made by this passenger, we conducted additional research, interviews and investigation, all of which takes time to insure accuracy, and are now able to release our report of the incident that took place aboard that aircraft. Be prepared to be shocked, angered, and perhaps saddened by our national and corporate acquiescence to mafia-type tactics by Islamists who are engaged in a full frontal assault, and laughing about it.

Unsurprisingly, the facts we developed during the course of our investigation are inconsistent with those being reported in the media, despite the media having the responsibility to report the truth.

The incident

A group of thirteen men dressed in traditional Muslim attire were among 73 passengers who boarded AirTran Flight 297 on Tuesday, 17 November 2009, a routine flight scheduled to depart Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, gate C-16 at 4:43 PM ET to Houston Hobby Airport. Reports developed by this investigator found two witnesses who observed direct interaction among all of these Muslim men at the terminal.

As the passengers boarded the aircraft, two of the Muslim men took seats in first class, while the remaining eleven were seated throughout the remaining rows of the aircraft. Most had carrying-on bags that they stowed in the overhead compartments above their seats.

As the aircraft began to taxi to the runway, a female flight attendant was beginning to issue the normal passenger advisories over the PA system. Almost on cue at the time passengers were told to turn off all electronic devices, one of the Muslim men seated in the front of the plane began to use his cell phone in a manner that was described by a flight attendant and passenger “as deliberate and obvious.” He was talking loudly in Arabic, nearly at the level of the flight attendant. Some reports suggest that this man actually called another Muslim passenger, although this has not been immediately confirmed. It is possible, however, as another passenger reported that a Muslim man seated toward the rear of the plane answered his cellular phone at the same time the man in the front began using his.

At this point, the flight attendant in the front of the plane approached the Muslim man using his telephone and instructed him to immediately turn it off. A second female flight attendant did the same at the rear of the aircraft. Concurrent with this cellular activity, two other Muslim men seated adjacent near the middle of the aircraft began operating what one passenger described as a palm type camcorder, ostensibly to view previously taken footage. It is possible, according to one flight attendant interviewed by this investigator, however, that the camcorder was being used for recording purposes. Whatever its use, a third flight attendant, aware of the incidents taking place in the front and rear of the aircraft, approached the two men for the purpose of securing the camcorder. At least two passengers reported that the men became abusive to the flight attendant and initially refused to comply with her request.

It was at this time that most of the passengers began to notice the multiple incidents involving over a dozen men dressed in Islamic attire. Next, as if previously rehearsed, at least ten of the 13 Muslim men aboard the aircraft began to leave their seats at the same time. At least one passenger stated she observed one of the Muslim passengers using his cell phone to take photos of other passengers on the aircraft, while one other Muslim passenger sang loudly in Arabic. According to information provided to this investigator from one of the flight crew who was alerted to an onboard emergency, the aircraft was now being taxied back to the terminal. The TSA, FAA and FBI were notified.

At the terminal

Once back at the terminal, the thirteen men were escorted from the aircraft by TSA and security officials. According to a report from an airline security official, their baggage was also removed and searched, finding nothing of apparent danger. According to a law enforcement official interviewed by telephone by this investigator on Monday, investigation revealed that all of the Muslim passengers are acquainted with each other and are associated with (or have ties to) a large Islamic center that has been the subject of investigative interest.

According to one aircraft passenger I interviewed, what happened next was “unbelievable” and caused a great deal of upset among the aircraft passengers and flight crew (some who opted off the flight in anger, fear, or admittedly, a mixture of both emotions).

After a lengthy delay while officials dealt with these Muslim passengers, ten (one uncorroborated report suggests 11) of the Muslim passengers were permitted to re-board the same aircraft to complete their flight. Some passengers and flight crew, traumatized by the blatant actions of the Muslim passengers, refused to travel with the Muslims who caused this orchestrated disturbance.

The flight continues

According to flight logs and information from one of the flight crew who continued with the flight, AirTran 297 ultimately departed Atlanta and arrived in Houston later that evening. The flight, however, was not without its curious incidents by the very same Muslim men who caused the initial delay and disturbance.

During the flight, one passenger interviewed by this investigator described the behavior of two of the Muslim passengers as less overt but still suspicious in nature. Without apparent legitimate purpose, one Muslim passenger moved a stowed bag from one part of the aircraft to another, well away from his seated position. Another spoke loudly in Arabic, with all appeared to interact in one form or another.

Ultimately, the flight landed safely and despite the early incidents in Atlanta, the Muslim passengers appeared able to leave freely from the terminal.

Comments from flight crew and airline personnel

As initially stated, proper and accurate investigation takes time to corroborate eyewitness accounts, which are often unreliable, contradictive and in cases like this, colored by emotion. Having interviewed a total of seven-(7) individuals directly involved in this incident over the last several days, including two law enforcement officers who handled the after action reports, the situation pertaining to the initial 13 and remaining 10 or 11 Muslim men allowed to continue their travels was far greater than an incident involving the unauthorized use of a cell phone that resulted in a minor flight delay, as reported by the mainstream media.

According to one airline security official, “This was a deliberate, well planned attempt to disrupt a domestic flight that was organized in advance of the boarding of these [Muslim] passengers. The purpose of their actions appeared to be multi-faceted, not the least of which was an attempt to change their status from innocuous passengers to victims of religious profiling. The situation was handled in a manner that we believe might have avoided an incident like USAir had in 2006, where everyone from the passengers who reported suspicious behavior to the airline was subjected to legal action by the Muslim passengers.”

While litigation might have been avoided, passengers and flight crew remain traumatized, and our air travel system was unnecessarily disrupted during one of the busiest air travel weeks in the U.S. The agenda of the Islamists behind this incident is clear, yet no one in the media seems to have the desire to expose these ideological cretins for what they are.

Additional information about this incident is forthcoming.

Related “required reading:”

Islamic Ideological Jihad – a terror tactic

“Flashback: One year ago”

Douglas J. Hagmann – quoted in The Washington Times in an article by Audrey Hudson

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=3312

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.

Tags: , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

Coward Obama vs Navy SEALS

December 1st, 2009

Exculpatory evidence for Navy Seals

Print ArticleDigg it!FacebookEdit Post
By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

1 December 2009: As detailed in an article by Jim O’Neill at Canada Free Press, three U.S. Navy seals have been charged with assaulting a terrorist mastermind, allegedly causing him a bloody lip at some point during his capture. The allegedly injured terror suspect, Ahmed Hashim ABED was the focus of an extensive search that culminated in his capture by U.S. Navy Seals last September. Investigation by the military found that ABED reportedly planned and superintended the capture, murder and subsequent desecration of the bodies of four U.S. subcontractors delivering food and supplies to Iraqis near the town of Fallujah on 31 March 2004.

There is much rightful outrage over the charges of assault pending against the three U.S. Seals. Unfortunately, that point has been rendered moot as charges against the Seals have been filed and they face formal arraignment a week from today. The ludicrous nature of the charges aside, outrage is unfortunately obscuring an extremely important piece of exculpatory evidence that should be introduced in their defense. The allegation of abuse during capture or while in detention adhere to a carefully outlined plan published by the enemy in late 2003, is an effective and demoralizing operational tactic of the enemy.

Enemy Playbook
The claims by ABED follow a precise strategy detailed by an online paramilitary training series known as “al Battar,” which provides instructions on all aspects of Islamic warfare. First published in 2003, al Battar provides detailed instructions to Islamic terrorists on methods to fight the West, from practical weapons training to ideological warfare. The al Battar training series was concurrently supplemented by a sister publication known as the Voice of Jihad, a publication that provides more detailed ideological and scholarly instruction to terrorists than the al Battar series. Together, the publications provide valuable insight into the tactics of Islamists on and off the battlefield. The Northeast Intelligence Network has been extensively involved in securing, translating, and providing tactical analysis of that publication to military and federal authorities.

Among the topics contained within the instructional series are methods to employ when captured by Western forces. The favored approach by the captive is to allege abuse during capture or detention, which serves to exacerbate the ongoing political debates pertaining to the classification, handling and disposition of enemy combatants.

If our leaders require us to engage in this insane self-flagellation by forcing the three Seals into the criminal justice system, it is my hope that their attorneys present the aforementioned publications into evidence. It will be abundantly clear that ABED was merely following the Islamic warfare playbook.

Tags: , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

Silent screams and stifled statistics

November 4th, 2009

Silent screams and stifled statistics

Print ArticleDigg it!FacebookEdit Post
By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

4 November 2009: Twenty year-old Noor Faleh Almaleki of suburban Phoenix died Monday, becoming the latest non-statistic in a rising number of honor killings taking place across the U.S. by Muslims. These honor killings are perpetrated by practicing Muslims against their own family members who believe such action is sanctioned by (Islamic) Sharia law. In the case of the young Ms. Almaleki, her Iraqi-born father, Faleh Hassan Almaleki, has been charged with running over his own daughter and her boyfriend’s mother with his vehicle for allegedly engaging in behavior considered “shameful” under Islam. It is interesting and relevant to note that although Faleh Almaleki admitted his actions to police, authorities have steadfastly declined to release any information about what the suspect actually said during police questioning.

While the murder of Ms. Almaleki is itself significant, murder and other crimes of violence taking place in the U.S., Canada and throughout the West by Muslim adherents of Islamic jurisprudence should be ringing some very serious statistical alarm bells within the law enforcement community, prosecutorial agencies and judicial venues. Instead, the exact opposite is taking place due to carefully crafted influence exerted on and within the United States Department of Justice. That influence is well over a decade old, but gained significant ground with the creation and implementation of “outreach programs” at the federal level following the attacks of 9/11.

It is not merely enough that murder and other domestic crimes of violence as a result of the religious and cultural tenets of Islam are not being publicly acknowledged, they are not being statistically identified. Consequently, the adverse impact by the adherents to fundamentalist Islam on our society and to our culture is not being routinely addressed. Further, the threats to non-Muslims as “collateral damage” in Muslim honor killings, as clearly illustrated in the Almaleki case, are not being properly disclosed.

Moreover, violent domestic crime that is directly related to the Islamic culture that continues to be imported into the U.S. is easily downplayed in the absence of any reliable justice department statistics showing otherwise. Not only is this practice deceptive by design, it has the potential to create more victims like Ms. Almaleki. Left unchanged, it will.

One of the more recent, high-profile cases where the lack of crime statistics played a role is that of Rifqa Bary, a 17 year-old girl who fled from her Ohio home to Florida due to her alleged fear of falling victim to the ultimate punishment under Sharia law at the hands of her family. During a lengthy, frequently convoluted and often emotional process of court hearings and legal maneuvers, it was ultimately ruled that the minor Rifqa must be returned to the custody of her parents.

As an investigator with substantial field and courtroom experience, I followed that case closely, and it is indeed my professional opinion that there is a legitimate threat to the life of Rifqa Bary. Although I believe that there was a failure of the judiciary to give adequate weight to the testimony of lay witnesses, I do not believe that the judge should shoulder all of the blame in this case. I make that statement with complete knowledge of its potential unpopularity, but base it on an evaluation of direct, non-anecdotal evidence accessible to the supporters of Rifqa.

Bloggers in support of Rifqa were emotionally charged and contributed to an almost circus-like atmosphere outside of the courtroom at the Florida hearings. They can hardly be blamed for their emotional reactions to a system that relies more on bureaucratic agencies that have been infiltrated and co-opted by Islamic interests disguised as “PC speak” than reality. This is the same “politically correct” system that is presently being forced upon every mind-numb American by the so-called progressives to the ultimate peril of our freedoms, our culture and ultimately our nation.

In the case of Rifka Bary, wars of words erupted and degraded into shouting matches between shills for Muslim advocacy groups and Rifka’s supporters while an ambivalent and bemused media watched. Many valid points in support of Ms. Bary’s petition were made, but the bureaucratic machinery that most often holds the most weight in such legal machinations, although functionally incompetent, prevailed.

Perhaps if the team of well-intentioned proponents of Rifqa Bary were able to cite currently non-existent crime report statistics illustrating the existence of a clear and present threat, combined with other direct evidence, the case might have turned out differently. Instead, the emotional outcries overshadowed any possibility of delivering even the slightest bit of coherency which, of course, is exactly what the media reported. The legal system, hobbled by the strong lobby of progressives – Islam’s current bed partners – failed Rifqa.

To the peril of every non-Muslim in the West, specifically in the U.S. and Canada, our respective justice departments, law making and law enforcement agencies have been effectively neutered through infiltration or marginalized by operatives of refined, well orchestrated and heavily bankrolled Islamic advocacy groups. The most notable of these groups of course, is the Council on American and Islamic Relations (CAIR) and CAIR Canada, whose rabid pro-Islamist operatives have managed to gain positions or exert influence inside a variety of law enforcement agencies on all levels. Perhaps the most insidious infiltration of all, however, is within the U.S. Department of Justice.

As a result, all statistics involving Muslims, from hate crimes to honor killings have been deliberately and dishonestly skewed. Facing the possibility of protracted litigation from predatory lawsuits over religious discrimination and civil rights violations, as well as the unpopular political fallout such actions would create, top administration officials could not succumb fast enough to the metastatic growth of political correctness that is running a gauntlet for Islamic interests. Their acquiescence traded our individual and collective security for the illusion of fairness, and abandoned intellectual honesty to appease special interests.

It has never been more obvious than in the sad case of Noor Faleh Almaleki, who could effectively serve as “Exhibit A” for the “next” Rifqa Bary.

“Hate crimes” & “Honor Killings”

Every year since 1929, annual crime statistics have been compiled from the records of police departments across the United States. Those statistics comprise the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. Since 1930, the FBI has been publishing annual crime statistics in a comprehensive report known as Crime in the United States (CIUS). That report currently reflects statistics collected from 17,876 police departments across the U.S., according to the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Of the 17,876 departments, 13,241 law enforcement agencies participated in the UCR Program’s hate crime data collection in 2007. That same year, there were 7,624 incidents classified as “hate crimes” submitted by 2,025 agencies, according to 2007 Uniform Crime Report of Hate Crime Statistics.

Investigation and research by this author into the documentation that comprises hate crime statistics for 2007 (the figures for 2008 will be available through the FBI on November 23, 2009) found that the parameters used for “hate crimes” against Muslims are exceptionally broad and artificially inflated as a result. These expanded parameters are, in many cases, the direct result of CAIR officials demanding certain dubious questionable events to be included in anti-Muslim hate crime statistics. Examples are plentiful, and include unverified reports of minimal, if not insignificant property damage at mosques and Islamic centers. A trampled flower bed at a mosque, as one example, was listed as an anti-Islamic “hate crime” statistic.

In 2007, crimes classified as having their motivation in anti-Muslim bias amounted to about 9 percent of all hate crimes. By contrast, crimes against Jews, or those having an anti-Semitic motive amounted to nearly 70% during that same period. Despite those figures and the obvious disparity, there has been a continual and vociferous demand for special considerations within law enforcement on behalf of Muslims due to the deceitful embellishment of post-9/11 anti-Islamic bias. Although the statistics for 2008 are not yet published, a review of available reports indicates that the anti-Islamic motivated crimes have dropped significantly. Nonetheless, claims of anti-Islamic bias have risen exponentially during that same period.

Meanwhile, statistics of crimes by Muslims against Muslims, specifically those involving domestic violence, from Sharia sanctioned spousal abuse to “honor killings” are not maintained. The omission of this statistical classification is not due to its rarity, but by deliberate omission. Although the raw statistics exist within the comprehensive CIUS report, they are not properly categorized within the UCR Program’s hate crime data collection. Therefore, they remain a statistic that does not officially exist, except for the victims of such crimes.

To obtain a better perspective regarding honor killing, consider that the results of an epidemiological study recently published in the European Journal of Public Health identified that one in every five homicides in Pakistan is an “honor killing.” Even as alarming as that number might be, that figure is considered to be much lower than the actual number due to cultural and reporting factors, according to the author of the study.

Unsurprisingly, statistics regarding honor killings and other forms of domestic violence among Muslims from over half of the Muslim nations researched found numbers to be consistent with those of Pakistan or higher. In those cultures, women are not only unequal to men, but husbands may beat their wives in Sharia compliant venues. At its most extreme, honor killings are accepted and sanctioned under Sharia law. Considering the number of Muslims who have moved to the U.S. and Canada who remain adherent to the tenets of Sharia law, it would be unreasonable and intellectually dishonest not to address this issue.

One should not expect officials of CAIR or CAIR Canada, including those who are involved in shaping policy at justice department levels, to endorse the compilation of statistics regarding domestic crimes in Muslim families in the U.S. or Canada. Despite their self-described depiction as an advocate of Islamic civil rights and contrary to their public position, some CAIR officials and leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood associated with CAIR have endorsed all of the aspects of Sharia law, including those that accept or tacitly approve of Sharia justice. Do not let CAIR, the media, or any government agency or official tell you otherwise.

If we continue on this same path, there will be many more victims like Noor Faleh Almaleki, and more court rulings placing young women in peril like the case of Rifqa Bary. Changing direction will require changing policy. And policy change can only happen when those who have the power to make such changes accept the facts about Islam not only as a religion, but as a culture and political process – and have the courage to stand up and speak out.

Otherwise, the statistics that scream out for disclosure will be drowned out only by the screams of cultural Islam’s next victims.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in photos | 2 Comments »

None dare call it TREASON

September 24th, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

None dare call it TREASON
Posted By Sean Osborne On September 24, 2009 @ 10:48 am In Editorials, Ideological Jihad, Intelligence Analysis, International Terror, Sean Osborne | Comments Disabled

By Sean Osborne, Associate Director, Military Affairs Specialist

24 September 2009: Islam and its non-apostate adherents declared war against anything and everything non-Islamic at its inception in the Arabian heartland in 610 AD, fourteen centuries ago. Islam has always been a theology of hate, violence, wanton bloodshed and war. Islam is an equal opportunity hater because its violence is not only directed against those it considers infidels (kafirs) but those who are fellow Muslims. This is plainly evident in every nation on planet earth where Islam asserted itself through military conquest or remains as the dominant force over the past fourteen centuries. This fact is evident within Islam’s colonies in unconquered nations such as these United States. In no nation on planet earth is Islam a dominant force where violence, wanton bloodshed or wars were not the sole method of achieving that dominance.

It was in the face of these unassailable truths that the President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama declared just a few short months ago in the Egyptian and Turkish capitals, “America is not and never will be at war with Islam.” Have you ever heard a more treasonous statement since September 11, 2001?
Earlier this month President Barack Hussein Obama hosted the now-traditional Iftar feast celebrating the end of what he referred to as the “holy season” of Ramadan.

Raising up a quote from boxing legend Muhammad Ali before all of the Muslim ummah and non-Muslim infidels (kafirs) in attendance, President Barack Hussein Obama gave his seal of approval, indeed his personal view of why Islam is “truth:” “A few years ago he explained this view, and this is part of why he’s The Greatest, saying, ‘Rivers, ponds, lakes and streams, they all have different names, but they all contain water. Just as religions do, they all contain truths.’”

Was it any accident that one of the Muslims invited by the White House to attend the Iftar feast was Muslim convert Dr. Ingrid Mattson, president of the terrorist Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)? ISNA is one of nearly 300 unindicted co-conspirator terrorists identified by federal prosecutors in the U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial. On November 24, 2008, after seven days of deliberation and six weeks of testimony, a jury convicted the HLF and five of its leaders on all counts of providing material support to the Islamic terrorists of HAMAS (?arakat al-Muq?wamat al-Isl?miyyah, or “Islamic Resistance Movement”). As has been stated many, many times before, ISNA, CAIR and a host of other Islamic organizations are nothing more than fronts or associates of the al-Ikhwan al-Muslimuun, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), which itself is nothing more than a front for the Islamic terrorists of HAMAS. Of course this was no accident; these enemies of the United States of America and our Constitutional Republic are President Obama’s friends. Invite one and you have effectively invited them all to the Iftar feast. None dare call this treason?

So, with this emanating from the top of the American chain of command during a time of war should there be any doubt about why other unconscionable things are occurring on a daily basis these days?

Is there any doubt about why this president has continually stabbed our principle Middle Eastern ally in Israel squarely in the back at every opportunity?

How many eyebrows or voices rise in righteous indignation when President Barack Hussein Obama and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton allow the dispatching of representatives of CAIR on overseas diplomatic missions to the Islamic Republic of Iran as representatives of the interests of the United States in return for CAIR intelligence briefings to them upon their return? Is this not absolutely insane in the face of the FBI’s finding that CAIR is a front organization for the terrorists of HAMAS?

Are the American people aware of the fact that while President Barack Hussein Obama speaks grandiose words on how we and our allies need to stick together and work closely in the fight in Afghanistan against the perpetrators of September 11, 2001, he then makes deals with our Russian enemy and pulls the plug on a missile defense system to be deployed on the territory of these same allies.

Yes, the missile defense system was to be deployed on the territory of Poland and the Czech Republic. Its purpose was to defend both the American homeland, as well as our allies, from the potential of nuclear missile attacks launched by Iran. Poland and the Czech Republic have been steadfast allies of America in this war, contributing troops, treasury and blood to the fight against Islam. And how does President Barack Hussein Obama repay our allies for their assistance? He denies them the presence of American troops on their soil who would operate these systems. Is it any wonder then that Poland is the first to respond to this back-stabbing by announcing they will not deploy a large contingent of their soldiers to Afghanistan? I do not for one second blame the Polish government for taking such a decision, particularly in light of the unambiguous statement made by the commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, that the failure to deploy more soldiers into the theater of combat operations will result in an all-but-certain condition of “mission failure.” Let that sink in. The American commander telling his commander in chief that failure to surge more troops into the war will result in mission failure in Afghanistan, the origin of the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Who are President Barack Hussein Obama’s friends? Who does he stand with in this war? On page 261 of his book “The Audacity of Hope” our elected President provides us with a precise answer to these questions: “I will stand with them [the Muslims] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” Wars are declared by politicians. Obama is a politician. Now that you’ve read his words, pay closer attention to his actions. They are not in our best interests. His intent is to allow America and our sons and daughters in harm’s way to simply bleed to death.

And none dare call this treason.

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=3085

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

Obama, world most significant lier

September 1st, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

Putting the Obama Puzzle Together
Posted By Randy Taylor On July 8, 2009 @ 11:46 am In Globalist Agenda, Intelligence Analysis, Iran, Iraq, Randy Taylor | Comments Disabled

By Randy Taylor

This has taken some time to put together, yet once you read this piece in its entirety, hopefully the puzzle of Obama will come into clear focus. I’ve been puzzled by his very presence, by his quick, unexplained rise to power, his predetermined placement in the mass of confusion we are experiencing.
The last eight years under Bush created great divides in this country on both sides of the American political spectrum. Most everyone was in favor of war in 2001 especially after we suffered the attacks of 9/11. Yet, as usual, America was quick to forget their initial reactions to 9/11 and as the war in Afghanistan and the war in Iraq waged on without measurable results, their interest in war diminished. This is understandable, as we are a results oriented society and culture and the results still aren’t clearly visible. We still have not killed or captured Osama bin Laden nor have we put much of a dent in the spread of Islamic terrorism around the world. Any claimable results we may have in Afghanistan and Iraq are overshadowed by the massive spread of Islamic terrorism in other regions of the world, which at best makes these wars a loss with the cost of trillions of dollars and the massive loss of life on US forces, Canadian forces, other coalition forces as well as civilian casualties. The Islamic terrorist are still very active and their presence is growing in Afghanistan, Iraq as well as Somalia, Yemen, Algeria and other countries in Africa and the Middle East. This is where we are today and this is where we stood on November 4, 2008. The entire world blamed Bush for this mess. It was time to put the George W. Bush puppet away and dig out a new one for the White House. Let’s see, the black one, controversial, hint of Muslim loyalty, birth certificate issues, and the polar opposite of Bush on campaign trail. Yep, that’ll work.

Out of obscurity a young, black politician emerges. He was completely opposite of George Bush and John McCain in all his campaign rhetoric. He made promise after promise to his ever growing voting base. He says the wars will be ended, the troops will come home, promises no more big government, says he believes in government transparency, etc. He woos the young voters like a rock star, uses the internet to secure votes and spread his lies. He makes promise after promise, knowing he will not keep any of them.

People were so upset with George Bush, they would have voted for Bozo the Clown if he had run against the Republican Party. This helps insure victory for this young unheard of politician. He takes the election with an estimated 51% of the nation’s vote, which even if the results weren’t exactly accurate; it doesn’t matter as Presidents aren’t elected anymore. They are chosen and the Electoral College insures this. The election process is a dog and pony show, as these decisions are made long before November 4 each election cycle. Even so, there still has to be the appearance that the “most popular” candidate wins so there isn’t an investigative review of the electoral process.

So why was Barack Hussein Obama chosen? This is actually quite obvious when you examine the case. The fact that he is a Muslim was hinted at during the elections yet never proven. This drew the support of the ever growing Muslim population in the US. Groups like CAIR and other Muslim groups very quickly threw their Saudi dollars into campaign support to sell Obama to the US voters. The very fact that he may not have even been born in America, but instead Kenya made him even more popular with Muslims.

The Muslim connection was the key in this process. George Bush wasn’t very popular with Muslims around the world and John McCain was viewed as an extension of George Bush and his policies. McCain never had a chance. Actually most of America was surprised when McCain was placed on the ticket as the Republican nominee. We all asked “Out of all the Republicans available to run, why McCain?” McCain was chosen because McCain would not win. This was predetermined.

Obama was brought in for one reason and one reason only. The scope of work for Obama is make friends with key powers in the Muslim world while crippling America into economic depression to the point that a one world government will appeal to the people. The powers that be, the ones that are behind the scenes and dictate to the White House need to insure the support of all major Muslim countries, except for Iran. He United States is intent on seeing Iran brought down whether by the US or Israel, but brought down either way. The problem with attacking Iran though is the lack of support by the other key nations in the Muslim world. I’ll explain the necessity of either disarming or destroying Iran a bit later.

Bush used to dance around the subject of Islam and made feeble attempts at gaining support of the key Muslim countries by saying that Muslims were a peaceful people and that the religion had been hijacked by a few bad people. However, he was the one that initiated the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq so his credibility was severely damaged in that regard. He could say what he wanted but the bottom line is he signed the orders for war.

Obama on the other hand campaigned against the war. This made him a hopeful in the eyes of the Muslims from the onset. Since he took office he has bent over backwards to appeal to the Muslim world as an ally. Obama is appointing Muslims into key positions within the US government, is speaking out against Israel, is sympathetic to Palestinians and is pulling troops out of Iraq. Why? It is simply to look sympathetic to Muslims and as a gesture to show tolerance and gain their support. Classic bait and switch in progress.

Barack Hussein Obama is a plant, a Manchurian candidate of sorts. He was chosen by the architects and designers of this New World Government. I’m not 100% entirely sure who these people are but there is a group behind the scenes that are orchestrating key governments with the end result being a one world government. George Bush Sr. spoke of this new world government, Bill Clinton spoke of it and George W. Bush spoke of it and even the Pope states that this is the way to save the world economically. It’s not a conspiracy theory anymore, it is fact. The only question is exactly who is running the show. Many speak of the Bilderberg Group as the group behind the scenes and granted, they are behind the scenes but they are a distraction, a decoy. They are too obvious and too easily seen. The Bilderberg Group keeps the conspiracy theorists busy while the real powers operate without an audience. They are the front men for the real powers pulling strings.

Anyone who has studied Islam at all knows that Iran, the seat of hardcore Islam will never agree to a New World Government that isn’t 100% Islamic and under Sharia law. Islam is a religious system that encompasses government and every detail of life. It isn’t just a religion. Their entire political system is built around it. This does not fit in with the New World Government that is planned for us. But if we want to eliminate or disarm Iran, we will need the support of the other key Muslim countries in the Middle East. The countries that we are attempting to gain support from are all recipients of Western dollars and are interested in economic growth for their countries. They would entertain a world government as they would benefit from it. Iran has no interest in this plan. Not that it was ever presented to them, it is a given that they will not accept it. They would push the world into World War III before they would surrender their sovereignty to a New World Government run by non-Muslims.

Iran is a threat to the western world and Israel, make no mistake. The al Qaeda movement and militant Islam are extensions of this Islamic threat. Yet we have a unique situation where we have two huge threats to our freedom and our way of life. We have Iran, the seat of Islamic terrorism worldwide that would like to see us destroyed and at the same time, we have our own government stripping away our rights, systematically destroying our economy and rapidly surrendering our sovereignty as a nation in favor of a New World Government. The other threat is indeed our own government. The worst part is that our western leaders have taken the Islamic threat to western civilization and used it in their favor as a method of stripping away our rights, invading our privacy and surrendering our sovereignty to this New World Government, all under the guise of improving our security. Security at the sacrifice of basic freedoms isn’t really security. Placing Muslims into key government positions doesn’t exhibit clear thinking on security matters either, but it is a measured risk in the eyes of the powers that be.

All the focus is on Iran right now as it has been for the last seven years, immediately after we invaded Iraq. Obama keeps the focus on Iran too, offering to have dialogue with them, yet knowing they won’t accept. But to the Muslim nations, it looks as though Obama is trying. That is why he was brought in. To make the US look Muslim friendly to the Muslim countries that are not as hard core as Iran. He wants to see us merged with these “friendly” Muslim countries under a one world government. He is selling us out to our enemies.

We moved into Afghanistan and Iraq to gain strategic positions on Iran. This was obvious. Iraq didn’t have the weapons of mass destruction to the extent that we claimed. Bush even made several jokes about WMD’s at a speaking engagement when he was President as he knew damn good and well that Iraq wasn’t the threat he made it out to be. But Saddam had to go as he would have never subscribed to a new world government either. We now have airbases in both countries which allows for ground or air movement against Iran when the time comes. Even if we withdraw, we will never fully leave these countries. We will maintain a military presence there just as we have done with every other country we have “withdrawn” from.

Barack Hussein Obama has not kept a single campaign promise and his supporters should take note of this. We are withdrawing some troops from Iraq yet we are beefing up in Afghanistan. He hasn’t done squat for the economy and is instead installing a Socialist agenda within our country. He is signing us up for Cap and Trade Agreements which has Americans being set up to pay taxes or penalties to a central world government body, which is obviously part of this new world government being imposed on us. He doesn’t place any value on any human life that is viewed as a burden or a mistake. He is manipulating the media ferociously and is censoring press conferences at the White House while saying he believes in government transparency. He is a liar and a fraud. That isn’t just my opinion, no, that is fact. Do the research. Go back and look at his campaign and then look at what he has done since he has been in office.

Beware of this person. Beware of all that agree with him or speak in a like manner of a one world government. They are a detriment to mankind as a whole. They are the precursors of the beast.

Be safe. Stay vigilant.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. -Thomas Jefferson

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2900

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

Russia on the move

August 24th, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

Is Russia setting the stage for a nuclear apocalypse?
Posted By Director On August 24, 2009 @ 11:00 am In Arrests/Convictions, Douglas J. Hagmann, Fifth Column, Globalist Agenda, Intelligence Analysis, Iran, Randy Taylor, Russia, Sean Osborne, Special Reports, Weapons of Mass Destruction | Comments Disabled

“I can’t say anything about the roots of this story and I don’t plan to dig further… I need to think about my own skin too. Understand that as you will.” –Mikhail Voitenko, editor of the Russian maritime Bulletin Sovfrakht., speaking about the “hijacking” of the Arctic Sea

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director, & Sean Osborne, Military Affairs Specialist

24 August 2009: While it might seem like an unusual morphing of the movies Inside Man and The Hunt for Red October, the account of the cargo ship Arctic Sea is far stranger than either fictional account. Based on information developed through our extensive investigation, we can authoritatively state, without hyperbole, that the mysteries surrounding the MV Arctic Sea are as deep as the Atlantic waters where it navigated and its “alleged” secret cargo as potentially dangerous to an unsuspecting, distracted populace as the coastal rip tides produced by a late summer hurricane.
Imagine a 4,000 ton, 100 meter commercial cargo ship, manned by a crew of 15, equipped with an automatic identification system (AIS), a satellite navigation beacon, and state of the art communication equipment, including satellite phones and the cellular telephones of the crew, laden with $1.2 – $1.8 million of cut lumber and manned by a crew of 15, suddenly and inexplicably “disappearing completely off the grid” for two weeks – allegedly at the hands of eight-(8) hijackers or “pirates.” Now, imagine the pirate attack of this low value target taking place in a busy transit area that has not seen an act of piracy since the 17th century.

That’s what reportedly transpired with the Arctic Sea, a Russian managed commercial cargo ship sailing under a Maltese flag and owned by the Finnish company Arctic Sea Ltd. The Russian management is from a sister company based in the Russian city of Arkhangelsk that reportedly provides “technical support” to the company and its sole vessel. Arkhangelsk is also the home of the 15 man crew of the Arctic Sea.

Now imagine a search for the missing vessel launched by numerous assets from the Russian Black Sea fleet in conjunction with NATO, the use of satellites and other forms of surveillance, and a “rescue mission” that ultimately secured the ship, rescued its crew and captured the alleged hijackers or pirates. Except this was no ordinary rescue of the crew and arrest of the hijackers. Some of the crew and all of the hijackers, including one who was later identified as a fisherman who supposedly died three years ago, were transported together by the Russians to a high security Moscow prison where they are being held incommunicado.

Next, imagine an investigation of the incident that has involved law enforcement from 20 countries, 3 intelligence agencies, and British nuclear response team – so far, all of which has been conducted under an unprecedented level of secrecy. Added to that shroud of secrecy are various bits of disinformation – news articles – that have been intentionally seeded to a non-inquiring media through Russian and other diplomatic sources.

Now finally, imagine the majority of those of us in the West having never even heard of this hijacking, the hijacked ship, its recovery, the rescue of crew and the “arrest” of the hijackers. The latter, of course is easier to imagine. The media minimalism can be attributed to a combination of government secrecy and a shortage of journalists willing to investigate an incident that has national and international security implications, rather than the more salacious and better selling celebrity debauchery.

The security implications pertaining to this incident are indeed ominous as they appear to directly relate to either a clandestine program of arming an enemy of the United States and Israel with nuclear weaponry or something far more sinister and conspiratorial. While the final chapter of this intriguing tale of high-stakes international nuclear smuggling has yet to be written, one thing has already been established: a global end-game scenario is being constructed while most of the world sleeps.

The adventures of the MV Arctic Sea

It began in June, when the Arctic Sea underwent about two-weeks of “repairs” at the Pregol shipyard in Kaliningrad, which is a Russian enclave situated between Poland and Lithuania. It is the base of the Russian Baltic Fleet and a notorious area for smuggling of everything from drugs to weapons. According to intelligence reports following the alleged disappearance of the vessel – reports independently confirmed by this author through direct inquiries with U.S. and Israeli intelligence sources, the “repairs” were not repairs at all, but a very extensive project that involved completely dismantling and rebuilding the ship’s bulkhead to special military-like specifications. This was done to accommodate what was described by these intelligence officials as “very expensive and very deadly” cargo.

Following the extensive renovation of the vessel, the Arctic Sea is anchored in Pietarsaari, on the West Coast of Finland to pick up its cargo of sawn timber that is reportedly destined for Algeria. The value of the cargo of timber is reported to be between $1.2 and $1.8 million.

On July 23, 2009, the Arctic Sea, flying the Maltese Flag, departed Pietarsaari with a crew of 15. It is scheduled to arrive at the port of Bejaia, Algeria on August 4, 2009. The ship reportedly has food supplies for a 45-day voyage and enough fuel for 40 days of cruising at sea.

Within 24 hours of its departure, the vessel is reportedly boarded by force in the early morning hours of July 24 near the Swedish island of Gotland. According to various sources, including some open source news reports, the crew was held, beaten and interrogated for 12 hours by eight-(8) armed attackers. Some reports suggest that the masked attackers posed as Swedish drug police who spoke English with an unidentified accent. Other reports indicate that the alleged hijackers, who approached the vessel in an inflatable style boat, did so under the pretext of distress aboard their boat.

What exactly happened aboard the Arctic Sea at this point remains unclear, as both public and private sources offer somewhat differing accounts. Some sources indicate that there were as many as 12 hijackers, with perhaps four leaving the Arctic Sea in the inflatable assault craft. Other sources, including some post-event news accounts, reported that all of these particular the attackers left the Arctic Sea within 12 hours of their initial attack. Based on our independent research, the latter account appears questionable at best.

What is consistent, however, are reports that the vessel’s Automatic Identification System (AIS) was turned off by someone aboard the vessel. A ship’s Automatic Identification System (AIS) is an interactive transponder that provides detailed information about the ship, somewhat similar to the “black box” of an aircraft by comparison.

The fact that the AIS system was switched off is critical to this event. Accounts of the ship’s AIS also comes into play later when sources indicate that is was actually removed from the vessel altogether. While some might contend that disabling this device is not impossible, all agree that it takes quite a bit of knowledge to do so. Removing it and making it functional on another ship requires even more specialized knowledge and ability. Simultaneously, the signal from the Arctic Sea’s satellite navigation beacon disappeared. It is the unanimous opinion of all intelligence sources that only those having very specialized knowledge are capable of incapacitating this beacon.

In any case, news of the incident of alleged “piracy” or “hijacking” and of the ship’s disappearance from the grid would remain a virtual secret for the next 4-5 days. Even more curiously, on July 28, four days after the boarding of the hostiles, the Arctic Sea reportedly made routine contact with the Dover Coastguard as it entered the English Channel.

It appears that the next odd transmission by the Arctic Sea set off alarm bells” of certain British maritime officials. According to both published and private sources, a short time after making the contact with Dover, the Arctic Sea reported the armed boarding of their vessel by the alleged Swedish drug police to the Helsinki police authorities, telling the Helsinki officials that everything was fine and they would follow-up with them after completing their journey.

The alleged boarding of the Arctic Sea by fake Swedish drug police, the subsequent and very delayed reporting of that event and that the crew was fine despite the extended detention and beatings, the disabling of the ship’s AIS, and altogether inconsistent reports from and about the ship sent up “red flags” that something was definitely awry aboard the Arctic Sea.

Suddenly, on July 30, 2009, a brief AIS signal was received from the Arctic Sea. At 1:29 AM Greenwich Mean Time, it was as if someone activated the AIS, only to have it turned off again minutes later. At this point, the ship basically “vanished” from the grid. The signal from the AIS placed the Arctic Sea between southwest England and France at that time.

Although there were no further electronic signals from the Arctic Sea, European maritime officials reported receiving radio calls from the Arctic Sea alleging yet a second attack against the ship off the Portuguese coast between July 31 and August 2, 2009. Intelligence sources interviewed by this author verified the allegation but openly questioned their veracity.

The following day, the company that insures the vessel allegedly received a ransom demand. Vladimir Dushin, vice-president of Renaissance Insurance, alleges that the company was contacted by telephone by an English-speaking caller who demanded $1.5 million or the crew of the Arctic Sea would be shot and the ship sunk. It was at this point that Interpol issued their initial hijacking alert for the Arctic Sea.

On August 4, 2009, the Arctic Sea failed to arrive at Bejaia as scheduled.

It was not until August 12, 2009, and only after public pressure by the families of the crew that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev ordered the Russian navy deployed in the Atlantic to locate the vessel and orders the military to take “all necessary measures” to recover the ship and its crew. On August 14, 2009, with many searching for the missing vessel, the Arctic Sea is reportedly sighted 500 miles off the Cape Verde Islands, west of Africa, according to French defense officials.

The next day, transmissions from the Arctic Sea’s AIS placed the ship in the Bay of Biscay. Despite the AIS “signature” marking its location, France announced that there was no cargo ship in the area. Interestingly and perhaps quite significantly, it was announced that the signal was coming from one of the three Russian Navy ships in that area.

On August 15, 2009, a joint Russia-NATO operation is officially launched to track and locate the Arctic Sea. It is at this point that reports begin to circulate among maritime and intelligence officials that this might not be a hijacking after all, and that the ship could be carrying some type of “special” cargo. Certain maritime security professionals, who have been following this incident closely, suggest that the Arctic Sea could be involved in the transporting of nuclear materials. These reports are immediately dismissed by Finnish authorities and other diplomatic officials.

The Arctic Sea is Located

On Monday, August 17, 2009, (2200 BST August 16), nearly 2 weeks after it was scheduled to arrive in Algeria, the Arctic Sea was located 300 nautical miles off the coast of Cape Verde by the Russian navy frigate Ladny. According to official reports, the eight unarmed hijackers were found aboard the ship along with all of the crew. While published reports of the naval rescue suggest that the hijackers threw their weapons overboard as the Russians approached, intelligence sources have indicated that there is nothing to indicate that the alleged hijackers were armed. Additionally, no evidence was found to suggest that the crew of the Arctic Sea was beaten as initially reported.

The following public statements made at a news conference and reported in Russia Today by Mikhail Voitenko, the editor of the online Maritime Bulletin-Sovfracht on August 17, 2009 therefore appear to make sense when considered through the maze of details surrounding the disappearance and “recovery” of the Arctic Sea:

“The fact is that it was not a criminal assault, it was not an act of piracy, and what exactly it was we don’t know. The vessel had all the necessary modern means of communication and emergency alarms, and was located in waters where regular mobile telephones work. To hijack the vessel so that no one makes a peep – not one alarm goes off – can you imagine how that could be? I can’t.”

Voitenko, whose company Sovfracht specializes in anti-piracy security consulting, also said the hijacking was beyond the means of ordinary pirates.

“The operation cost more than the cargo and ship combined.”

Declining to elaborate any further, Voitenko suggested that the ship’s cargo might not be drugs or arms, “but something much more expensive and dangerous.” He added:

“It seems some third party didn’t want this transit to be fulfilled so they made this situation highly sophisticated and very complicated.”

So, what exactly was on the MV Arctic Sea, what was the intended destination of that secret cargo, and where is it now? Our intelligence sources from the U.S. to the UK and Israel have provided critical and unsettling insight into these questions. Their answers paint a very disturbing picture of state-sanctioned nuclear arms smuggling that will likely set the stage for an apocalyptic, end-game scenario ripped directly from the Book of Revelation. The consequences of such a scenario, allowed to continue without interdiction or exposure, could forever change the balance of power, if not the actual global geographical landscape itself.

Part II will be published tomorrow.

——————————

Reference: Arctic Sea Events Timeline

June 2009: The Arctic Sea undergoes repairs at the Pregol shipyard in Kaliningrad, which is a Russian enclave situated between Poland and Lithuania. It is the base of the Russian Baltic Fleet and a notorious area for smuggling of everything from drugs to weapons. According to intelligence reports following the alleged disappearance of the vessel, the “repairs” were not repairs at all, but an extensive project that involved completely dismantling the ship’s bulkhead to accommodate some type of additional “special” cargo.

20 July 2009: The vessel is anchored in Pietarsaari on the West Coast of Finland to pick up its cargo of sawn timber worth $1.8 million.

23 July 2009: The Arctic Sea, flying the Maltese Flag, leaves Pietarsaari with a crew of 15 for the port of Bejaia in Algeria with a projected arrival date of August 4, 2009. The ship has food supplies for a 45-day voyage and enough fuel for 40 days of cruising.

24 July 2009: According to a number of various sources, the vessel is forcibly boarded in the early morning near the Swedish island of Gotland. Initial reports suggested that the crew was held, beaten and interrogated for 12 hours by eight-(8) armed attackers. Some reports suggest that the masked attackers posed as Swedish drugs police who spoke English with an accent. Some reports indicate that these are the men who have been arrested for the hijacking, although it was previously reported that the attackers left the Arctic Sea within 12 hours of their initial attack.

Other reports indicate that the hijackers forced the crew to change course and turned off the vessel’s navigation equipment (AIS), while others suggest the AIS was remotely turned off. Interestingly, news of this incident would remain a virtual secret for the next five-(5) days. By the time the Swedish report of the attack emerged, the ship had already passed through the English Channel.

28 July 2009: The Arctic Sea reportedly makes routine contact with the Dover Coastguard as it enters the English Channel. A short time later, the same day managers of the Malta flagged and Russian owned ship Arctic Sea report the armed boarding to the Helsinki police authorities.

30 July 2009: The last signal from the vessel’s automatic identification system (AIS) placed the Arctic Sea between southwest England and France. at 1:29 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time on July 30, the ship’s signal vanished.

31 July – 2 August 2009: European maritime officials report receiving radio calls from the Arctic Sea alleging a second attack off the Portuguese coast.

3 August 2009: According to published reports, Vladimir Dushin, vice-president of Renaissance Insurance, alleges that the company was contacted by telephone by an English-speaking caller who demanded $1.5 million or the crew of the Arctic Sea would be shot and the ship sunk. Interpol issues an initial hijacking alert for the Arctic Sea.

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2994

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.Idiot # 1

Tags: , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

August 20th, 2009

son of satan

Posted in photos | No Comments »

WHAT IF????????

August 17th, 2009

What would you say if I gave you 11 reasons why the elections in 2010 will be the most important in the history of the United States ?

1. What if I had told you in October 2008, before the last presidential election, that before Barack Obama’s first 100 days in office, the federal government would be in control of both the mortgage and the banking industries? That 19 of America ’s largest banks would be forced to undergo stress tests by the federal government which would determine if they were insufficiently capitalized, so they must be supervised by the government?
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America .”

2. What if I had told you that within Barack Obama’s first 100 days in office the federal government would be the largest shareholder in the US Big-Three automakers: GM, and Chrysler? That the government would kick out the CEO’s of these companies and appoint hand-picked executives with zero experience in the auto industry and that executive compensation would be determined, not by a Board of Directors, but by the government?
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !”

3. What if I had told you that Barack Obama would appoint 21 Czars, without congressional approval, accountable only to him, not to the voters, who would have control over a wide range of US policy decisions. That there would be a Stimulus Accountability Czar, an Urban Czar, a Compensation Czar, an Iran Czar, an Auto Industry Czar, a Cyber Security Czar, an Energy Czar, a Bank Bailout Czar, and more than a dozen other government bureaucrats with unchecked regulatory powers over US domestic and foreign policy.
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !”

4. What if I had told you that the federal deficit would be $915 billion in the first six months of the Obama presidency – with a projected annual deficit of $1.75 trillion – triple the $454.8 billion in 2008, for which the previous administration was highly criticized by Obama and his fellow Democrats. That congress would pass Obama’s $3.53 trillion federal budget for fiscal 2010… That the projected deficit over the next ten years would be greater than $10 trillion.
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !”

5. What if I had told you that the Obama Justice Department would order FBI agents to read Miranda rights to high-value detainees captured on the battlefield and held at US military detention facilities in Afghanistan . That Obama would order the closing of the Guantanamo detention facility with no plan for the disposition of the 200-plus individuals held there. That several of the suspected terrorists at Guantanamo would be sent to live in freedom in Bermuda at the expense of the US government. That our returning US veterans would be labeled terrorists and put on a watch list.
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !”

6. What if I had told you that the federal government would seek powers to seize key companies whose failures could jeopardize the financial system. That a new regulatory agency would be proposed by Obama to control loans, credit cards, mortgage-backed securities, and other financial products offered to the public.
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !!”

7. What if I had told you that Obama would travel to the Middle East, bow before the Saudi king, and repeatedly apologize for America ’s past actions. That he would travel to Latin America where he would warmly greet Venezuela ’s strongman Hugo Chavez and sit passively in the audience while Nicaraguan Marxist thug Daniel Ortega charged America with terrorist aggression in Central America .
Would you have said, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !!”

8. Okay, now what if I were to tell you that Obama wants to dismantle conservative talk radio through the imposition of a new “Fairness Doctrine.” That he wants to curtail the First Amendment rights of those who may disagree with his policies via internet blogs, cable news networks, or advocacy ads. That most major network television and most newspapers will only sing his phrases like state-run media in communist countries?
Would you say, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !!!”

9. What if I were to tell you that the Obama Justice Department is doing everything it can to limit your Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms. That the federal government wants to reinstate the so-called assault weapons ban which would prohibit the sale of any type of firearm that doesn’t require the shooter to pull the trigger every time a round is fired. That Obama’s Attorney General wants to eliminate the sale of virtually all handguns and ammunition, which most citizens choose for self-defense.
Would you say, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !!!”

10. What if I were to tell you that the Obama plan is to eliminate states rights guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment and give the federal government sweeping new powers over policies currently under the province of local and state governments and voted on by the people. That Obama plans to control the schools, energy production, the environment, health care, and the wealth of every US citizen.
Would you say, “C’mon, that will never happen in America !”

11. What if I were to tell you that the president, the courts, and the federal government have ignored the US Constitution and have seized powers which the founders of our country fought to restrict. That our last presidential election may have been our last truly free election for some time to come.
I know, I know what you will say. “That will never happen in America !”

If we don’t do everything in our power to stop this madness in 2010…
May God have mercy on our worthless souls.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in photos | 3 Comments »

The Death of Children

August 12th, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

A glimpse into the Islamic mindset
Posted By Director On August 11, 2009 @ 5:42 am In Douglas J. Hagmann, Fifth Column, Ideological Jihad, Legal Jihad | Comments Disabled

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

10 August 2009: Lately, people have forgotten that we are fighting a war for the very survival of our nation, our ideals, our culture and our freedom. Most people associate visible terrorism – bombs and bullets – with the war, failing to pay attention to the equally insidious assaults taking place through non-violent means.

Investigation conducted by the Northeast Intelligence Network, as well as other agencies and individuals concerned over the welfare of our great nation, has confirmed that Islamic fundamentalists have made great inroads in the West. Inside many of the Saudi funded mosques and Islamic centers in the U.S. and Canada, Imams are preaching a doctrine of hate and intolerance against all non-Muslims, with specific hatred against Jews and Christians. As clearly illustrated in these videos, they are attempting to import a perverse culture to replace Western values and ideology. It is important that we remind ourselves that the future of our nation is at stake, and attacks are not limited to those of violence.

Three year-old girl on Jews: “They are ‘apes and pigs,’ urged by adult Muslim fundamentalist:

Watch the video at this link.

Grooming young children for martyrdom: Link

Using Mickey Mouse to teach hatred for Israel & the Jews: Video link

Do you know what is being taught at your local mosque?

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=2981

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

« Older Entries