Posts Tagged ‘scum’

Obama the Muslim

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

The Betrayal of an American Ally

by Sean Osborne, Associate Director, Military Affairs

25 March 2010: Going back two years ago to 09 February 2007, just six months after the end of the 2006 war, I wrote a short article on this Northeast Intelligence Network website entitled “Lebanon, Syria & Israel: The Coming War.” In that article I detailed the previously unthinkable attack upon an Israel Defense Forces armored unit by the Lebanese Army at the very outset of the war. At the moment of the Lebanese Army attack all Israeli units were on Israel’s side of the Blue Line, which is to say that the IDF had not crossed into Lebanese territory but was conducting necessary mine-clearing operations on sovereign Israeli territory. The Lebanese Army commander had been expressly assured by the local IDF commander that he had no intention of crossing their common border. Yet the impotent and virtually useless Lebanese Army lay in waiting, fully prepared to ambush the IDF armored unit which had as its sole mission objective the clearing of Hezbollah-planted landmines on Israeli soil. The 2006 war began as a cleverly designed trap, an ambush, a kidnapping, and the government and military of Lebanon were full participants in it.

Media reports ever since have made reference to that 2006 war as the Hezbollah-Israel war, yet it remains widely unreported that the war was also fought directly between the Lebanese Army and the IDF. Moreover, I have subsequently been convinced that the Lebanese Army acted as a force multiplier for the Iranian and Syrian equipped Hezbollah forces. I also recognized three years ago that what we had just been witness to in Lebanon and northern Israel was a preview of the coming final fulfillment of the Psalm 83 war as prophesied by the ancient Hebrew seer Aspah over 3,000 year ago. With Psalm 83 in mind I concluded my article saying, “There is war coming to this border region, a very big war is coming. Iran and Syria with their terrorist proxies are spoiling for a very big war. I see no other tactical explanation which makes an iota of sense.”

A brief look at the first eight verses of the text of Psalm 83 is in order:

“Do not keep silent, O God!
Do not hold Your peace,
And do not be still, O God!
For behold, Your enemies make a tumult;
And those who hate You have lifted up their head.
They have taken crafty counsel against Your people,
And consulted together against Your sheltered ones.
They have said, “Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation,
That the name of Israel may be remembered no more.”

For they have consulted together with one consent;
They form a confederacy against You:
The tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites;
Moab and the Hagrites;
Gebal, Ammon, and Amalek;
Philistia with the inhabitants of Tyre;
Assyria also has joined with them;
They have helped the children of Lot. Selah”

The nationalities named in the above are represented today by the same Muslim nations and ethnic groups that comprise an inner ring of enemy nations surrounding the State of Israel. These are, as Asaph declares, existential enemies of Israel, their intention is to wipe Israel out as an extant nation so that the name Israel will be erased from memory. Sound familiar? Never before in history have all of these nations and ethnicities been arrayed against Israel at the same time as they are today, and have been since May 1948. Circa 1000 BC when Asaph wrote this very specific prophecy this grouping of nations and ethnicities did not constitute a unified threat to Israel. This grouping does constitute the modern day Lebanese, including Hezbollah, Jordanians, Bedouin Arabs, Saudi Arabians, West Bank Arabs of mixed ethnicities, Gazans, including Hamas, Sinai dwellers, Egyptians and Syrians. They are a unified force with a specific task to accomplish.

The full range of current events in this region is viewed as a whole by this author as constituting severe indications and warnings that the Psalm 83 war is an imminent probability. Whether the spark is a clash on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, or another missile-borne provocation coming from Hezbollah or HAMAS on Damascus’ or Tehran’s directive is probably immaterial because this next war will be a war that includes all of Israel’s enemies coming against her simultaneously, from without and from within. And unlike all the previous wars between Israel and its neighboring Muslim Arab enemies of the past 60 years, in this war it appears very likely that America will betray its Israeli ally and side with the Arabs. This is the unfortunate and entirely avoidable situation we are in at this time, a situation which until very recently has been festering quietly in small newspaper snippets buried deep in the back pages of newspapers. Yet nothing is more important to America’s future well-being than what this nation does in this war. For when it comes to modern day Israel the blessing or curse promised by the God of Abraham in Genesis 12:3 is in full effect.

Make no mistake, what is presently occurring between the State of Israel and the United States of America is quite different that what is being described in the global lame-stream media as constituting a “rift” or a “crisis,” or as being “strained” or even as “heightened tensions.” No, what is occurring now is nothing less than the execution of a long-planned, intricately manipulated betrayal of Israel by the godless Western elite, the “Global Oligarchy,” as orchestrated through the socialist regime currently occupying the White House.

Over the past year Northeast Intelligence Network Director Doug Hagmann had a series of conversations with a former highly-placed U.S. intelligence official which were reported in a series of articles on this website between December 2008 and March 2009. All of these articles contain information vital to the future of the nation, particularly if the pace of events in the Middle East allows us to reach the November 2010 mid-term election and rectify and impending Divine judgment and disaster on America. The first was “US Intelligence Official About Israel: This is just the beginning” which was followed by the second installment titled “The Coming War.” The phrase we were advised by that intelligence officer to keep in keen focus was “malicious intelligence” and which was to be viewed as integral with the actions of our own government in withdrawing our long-standing support of Israel.

The details I found most disturbing, and have kept front and center in my mind since their publication last March, were contained in Doug’s article entitled “The US Abandonment of Israel.” The detailed statements from the former intelligence officer are imperative reading in light of the events and news reports of the past week primarily due to their stunning, off-the-chart accuracy. In expounding upon a statement that something worse than mere American abandonment of its alliance with Israel would be forthcoming the intelligence officer added that the Obama Administration would provide more financial and military support to Israel’s enemies and would undercut Israel’s defensive efforts while simultaneously “pushing Israel to succumb to the pressure of unreasonable demands designed to end with their political annihilation as a nation.” In the past two weeks this is exactly, precisely what the Obama Administration has done to Israel. There is every indication these efforts will continue unabated and inevitably increase over time.

It cannot possibly be any clearer at this juncture, the administration of Barack Hussein Obama has a clearly defined pro-Muslim anti-Israel agenda and only “We the People” stand between it and a future no voting American parent wants for his or her children or grandchildren. Moreover, no American wants to stand before God and give account on why he or she failed to bless Israel in her greatest time of need.

Tags: , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

Communists, Muslim Scumobama tries to destroy Israel as well as America

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Peering behind the rift: Obama’s pro-Palestinian agenda

By Kate Evans-Taylor, Analyst

16 March 2010: The current animus between the U.S. and Israel is being carefully orchestrated by the Obama administration, and will eventually lead to this administration’s complete abandonment of our most trusted democratic ally in the Middle East -or worse. The “prediction” of abandonment and even embracing the Palestinian agenda was first published on this web site over 14 months ago, and the process appears to be right on schedule.

This “inside” information originated from a former highly placed intelligence official familiar with the agenda of the Obama administration who warned about the very events unfolding today. Although that source retired days after the initial interview with Doug Hagmann, the director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, he remains tapped in to Beltway sources. Speaking from his home in rural Virginia, he said that “I still have people who I speak with on a regular basis; I know what the overall agenda of this administration is, and hasn’t changed since I left.”

Moreover, this source believes that the current rift in relations was not only orchestrated by the Obama administration, it is purposely being manipulated to become a “defining moment and a watershed event” in U.S. and Israel relations. It will allow this administration to manipulate the facts to further sway world opinion against Israel and embolden the Palestinians. “It is designed to change the overall dynamic of the Middle East, something the Obama administration and his Arab backers had planned since the beginning,” stated this source. He added that this incident could be used to restrict or cancel the future sales of arms necessary for Israel’s defense.

The information he provided is also consistent with the analysis published Sunday by Sean Osborne, assistant director of the Northeast Intelligence Network. Mr. Osborne stated that “Obama has abandoned all pretense of neutrality and is clearly siding with his long-time radical Arab brethren,” and also noted that the posturing by the Obama Administration “has been designed to provoke if not precipitate an Arab-Israeli military confrontation.”

“I believe that time has proven me correct since that first interview [December 31, 2008], and the process of deliberate antagonism by this administration is right on schedule,” he said. It’s no secret that this administration is pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel, pro-Arab Muslim, which goes back to his relationships during his time in Congress. I haven’t seen much in the news about the foreign contributions to his campaign, which we knew from the beginning originated largely in Arab and Muslim countries. Look who is presently visiting and advising Obama, and in effect, controlling Middle East policy and posture toward Israel. You will find direct connections between the interests that initially funded him and those who are currently advising him,” he added.

“The entire situation [the announcement of Jewish building in Jerusalem] is a ‘red herring’ and has little to no impact on the Palestinians,” he stated. This former intelligence official pointed to a portion of an article penned by Rick Richman titled Un-Smart Diplomacy to underscore his point:

“Even actual building by Israel (much less the mere announcement of building in the future) would not have violated Israel’s commitment to a 10-month moratorium, which excluded Jerusalem. Second, the area in question is one that will not be yielded to the Palestinians in any conceivable peace agreement (even one that would divide sovereignty between Jewish and Arab areas) because it is a longstanding Jewish community, not an Arab one. Third, the area has military significance, for reasons explained (and illustrated with pictures) by Israel Matzav.”

“Anyone familiar with Israel’s ability to defend herself against external aggression, and that should include anyone and everyone of influence in this administration, knows that the area in question is of extreme importance to Israel’s national security,” this source stated.

And that appears to be exactly what this is all about. As Mr. Rickman points out and as is well known in this administration, the Palestinians have no legitimate claims to the area of intended construction. This area has never been an issue, except for those who oppose Israel’s right to exist. Unfortunately, people are not hearing the truth about this matter in the media.

The importance of the “disputed” area, Ramot Schlomo, for the security of the citizens of Israel is the real issue and cannot be understated. The article that appears on the Israel Matzav web site spells it out in the simplest of terms. The ridge where Ramot Schlomo sits overlooks every major highway in the city, including all modes of ingress and egress. “The Obama administration knows this, and so do Fatah, Hamas, and every Palestinian feigning outrage,” added our intelligence source.

“The Obama administration is using strong arm tactics privately and media manipulation publicly in their attempt to dismantle the nation of Israel, one block at a time, at the behest of the pro-Palestinian inside the White house.” Developing…

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in photos | 2 Comments »

“Dry Run” by Obama’s muslim scum brothers; an attempt disrupt airline system(s)

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

Security incident aboard AirTran Flight 297 suggests terror “Dry Run”
Posted By Director On December 3, 2009 @ 8:02 am In Domestic Terrorism, Editorials, Sean Osborne | Comments Disabled

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

3 December 2009: On November 17, an incident took place aboard AirTran Flight 297 scheduled to fly from Atlanta Hartsfield Airport to Houston that the media does not want to cover and everyone from the airline to the TSA and other government agencies want to keep very quiet. The reasons, I have been told, is fear of predatory lawsuits, negative publicity from accusations of religious profiling, and the obligatory subjugation to mindless mandatory Muslim sensitivity training that make a mockery of our American system of values. Interestingly, one airline official told me “we don’t want to become another flight 300,” which is a reference to a very similar scenario that took place aboard US Airways Flight 300 exactly three years ago.
I was first contacted about this incident two days after it happened by a passenger who was aboard AirTran Flight 297. Based on the allegations made by this passenger, we conducted additional research, interviews and investigation, all of which takes time to insure accuracy, and are now able to release our report of the incident that took place aboard that aircraft. Be prepared to be shocked, angered, and perhaps saddened by our national and corporate acquiescence to mafia-type tactics by Islamists who are engaged in a full frontal assault, and laughing about it.

Unsurprisingly, the facts we developed during the course of our investigation are inconsistent with those being reported in the media, despite the media having the responsibility to report the truth.

The incident

A group of thirteen men dressed in traditional Muslim attire were among 73 passengers who boarded AirTran Flight 297 on Tuesday, 17 November 2009, a routine flight scheduled to depart Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, gate C-16 at 4:43 PM ET to Houston Hobby Airport. Reports developed by this investigator found two witnesses who observed direct interaction among all of these Muslim men at the terminal.

As the passengers boarded the aircraft, two of the Muslim men took seats in first class, while the remaining eleven were seated throughout the remaining rows of the aircraft. Most had carrying-on bags that they stowed in the overhead compartments above their seats.

As the aircraft began to taxi to the runway, a female flight attendant was beginning to issue the normal passenger advisories over the PA system. Almost on cue at the time passengers were told to turn off all electronic devices, one of the Muslim men seated in the front of the plane began to use his cell phone in a manner that was described by a flight attendant and passenger “as deliberate and obvious.” He was talking loudly in Arabic, nearly at the level of the flight attendant. Some reports suggest that this man actually called another Muslim passenger, although this has not been immediately confirmed. It is possible, however, as another passenger reported that a Muslim man seated toward the rear of the plane answered his cellular phone at the same time the man in the front began using his.

At this point, the flight attendant in the front of the plane approached the Muslim man using his telephone and instructed him to immediately turn it off. A second female flight attendant did the same at the rear of the aircraft. Concurrent with this cellular activity, two other Muslim men seated adjacent near the middle of the aircraft began operating what one passenger described as a palm type camcorder, ostensibly to view previously taken footage. It is possible, according to one flight attendant interviewed by this investigator, however, that the camcorder was being used for recording purposes. Whatever its use, a third flight attendant, aware of the incidents taking place in the front and rear of the aircraft, approached the two men for the purpose of securing the camcorder. At least two passengers reported that the men became abusive to the flight attendant and initially refused to comply with her request.

It was at this time that most of the passengers began to notice the multiple incidents involving over a dozen men dressed in Islamic attire. Next, as if previously rehearsed, at least ten of the 13 Muslim men aboard the aircraft began to leave their seats at the same time. At least one passenger stated she observed one of the Muslim passengers using his cell phone to take photos of other passengers on the aircraft, while one other Muslim passenger sang loudly in Arabic. According to information provided to this investigator from one of the flight crew who was alerted to an onboard emergency, the aircraft was now being taxied back to the terminal. The TSA, FAA and FBI were notified.

At the terminal

Once back at the terminal, the thirteen men were escorted from the aircraft by TSA and security officials. According to a report from an airline security official, their baggage was also removed and searched, finding nothing of apparent danger. According to a law enforcement official interviewed by telephone by this investigator on Monday, investigation revealed that all of the Muslim passengers are acquainted with each other and are associated with (or have ties to) a large Islamic center that has been the subject of investigative interest.

According to one aircraft passenger I interviewed, what happened next was “unbelievable” and caused a great deal of upset among the aircraft passengers and flight crew (some who opted off the flight in anger, fear, or admittedly, a mixture of both emotions).

After a lengthy delay while officials dealt with these Muslim passengers, ten (one uncorroborated report suggests 11) of the Muslim passengers were permitted to re-board the same aircraft to complete their flight. Some passengers and flight crew, traumatized by the blatant actions of the Muslim passengers, refused to travel with the Muslims who caused this orchestrated disturbance.

The flight continues

According to flight logs and information from one of the flight crew who continued with the flight, AirTran 297 ultimately departed Atlanta and arrived in Houston later that evening. The flight, however, was not without its curious incidents by the very same Muslim men who caused the initial delay and disturbance.

During the flight, one passenger interviewed by this investigator described the behavior of two of the Muslim passengers as less overt but still suspicious in nature. Without apparent legitimate purpose, one Muslim passenger moved a stowed bag from one part of the aircraft to another, well away from his seated position. Another spoke loudly in Arabic, with all appeared to interact in one form or another.

Ultimately, the flight landed safely and despite the early incidents in Atlanta, the Muslim passengers appeared able to leave freely from the terminal.

Comments from flight crew and airline personnel

As initially stated, proper and accurate investigation takes time to corroborate eyewitness accounts, which are often unreliable, contradictive and in cases like this, colored by emotion. Having interviewed a total of seven-(7) individuals directly involved in this incident over the last several days, including two law enforcement officers who handled the after action reports, the situation pertaining to the initial 13 and remaining 10 or 11 Muslim men allowed to continue their travels was far greater than an incident involving the unauthorized use of a cell phone that resulted in a minor flight delay, as reported by the mainstream media.

According to one airline security official, “This was a deliberate, well planned attempt to disrupt a domestic flight that was organized in advance of the boarding of these [Muslim] passengers. The purpose of their actions appeared to be multi-faceted, not the least of which was an attempt to change their status from innocuous passengers to victims of religious profiling. The situation was handled in a manner that we believe might have avoided an incident like USAir had in 2006, where everyone from the passengers who reported suspicious behavior to the airline was subjected to legal action by the Muslim passengers.”

While litigation might have been avoided, passengers and flight crew remain traumatized, and our air travel system was unnecessarily disrupted during one of the busiest air travel weeks in the U.S. The agenda of the Islamists behind this incident is clear, yet no one in the media seems to have the desire to expose these ideological cretins for what they are.

Additional information about this incident is forthcoming.

Related “required reading:”

Islamic Ideological Jihad – a terror tactic

“Flashback: One year ago”

Douglas J. Hagmann – quoted in The Washington Times in an article by Audrey Hudson

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=3312

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.

Tags: , ,
Posted in photos | 1 Comment »

Coward Obama vs Navy SEALS

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Exculpatory evidence for Navy Seals

Print ArticleDigg it!FacebookEdit Post
By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

1 December 2009: As detailed in an article by Jim O’Neill at Canada Free Press, three U.S. Navy seals have been charged with assaulting a terrorist mastermind, allegedly causing him a bloody lip at some point during his capture. The allegedly injured terror suspect, Ahmed Hashim ABED was the focus of an extensive search that culminated in his capture by U.S. Navy Seals last September. Investigation by the military found that ABED reportedly planned and superintended the capture, murder and subsequent desecration of the bodies of four U.S. subcontractors delivering food and supplies to Iraqis near the town of Fallujah on 31 March 2004.

There is much rightful outrage over the charges of assault pending against the three U.S. Seals. Unfortunately, that point has been rendered moot as charges against the Seals have been filed and they face formal arraignment a week from today. The ludicrous nature of the charges aside, outrage is unfortunately obscuring an extremely important piece of exculpatory evidence that should be introduced in their defense. The allegation of abuse during capture or while in detention adhere to a carefully outlined plan published by the enemy in late 2003, is an effective and demoralizing operational tactic of the enemy.

Enemy Playbook
The claims by ABED follow a precise strategy detailed by an online paramilitary training series known as “al Battar,” which provides instructions on all aspects of Islamic warfare. First published in 2003, al Battar provides detailed instructions to Islamic terrorists on methods to fight the West, from practical weapons training to ideological warfare. The al Battar training series was concurrently supplemented by a sister publication known as the Voice of Jihad, a publication that provides more detailed ideological and scholarly instruction to terrorists than the al Battar series. Together, the publications provide valuable insight into the tactics of Islamists on and off the battlefield. The Northeast Intelligence Network has been extensively involved in securing, translating, and providing tactical analysis of that publication to military and federal authorities.

Among the topics contained within the instructional series are methods to employ when captured by Western forces. The favored approach by the captive is to allege abuse during capture or detention, which serves to exacerbate the ongoing political debates pertaining to the classification, handling and disposition of enemy combatants.

If our leaders require us to engage in this insane self-flagellation by forcing the three Seals into the criminal justice system, it is my hope that their attorneys present the aforementioned publications into evidence. It will be abundantly clear that ABED was merely following the Islamic warfare playbook.

Tags: , ,
Posted in photos | No Comments »

Silent screams and stifled statistics

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Silent screams and stifled statistics

Print ArticleDigg it!FacebookEdit Post
By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

4 November 2009: Twenty year-old Noor Faleh Almaleki of suburban Phoenix died Monday, becoming the latest non-statistic in a rising number of honor killings taking place across the U.S. by Muslims. These honor killings are perpetrated by practicing Muslims against their own family members who believe such action is sanctioned by (Islamic) Sharia law. In the case of the young Ms. Almaleki, her Iraqi-born father, Faleh Hassan Almaleki, has been charged with running over his own daughter and her boyfriend’s mother with his vehicle for allegedly engaging in behavior considered “shameful” under Islam. It is interesting and relevant to note that although Faleh Almaleki admitted his actions to police, authorities have steadfastly declined to release any information about what the suspect actually said during police questioning.

While the murder of Ms. Almaleki is itself significant, murder and other crimes of violence taking place in the U.S., Canada and throughout the West by Muslim adherents of Islamic jurisprudence should be ringing some very serious statistical alarm bells within the law enforcement community, prosecutorial agencies and judicial venues. Instead, the exact opposite is taking place due to carefully crafted influence exerted on and within the United States Department of Justice. That influence is well over a decade old, but gained significant ground with the creation and implementation of “outreach programs” at the federal level following the attacks of 9/11.

It is not merely enough that murder and other domestic crimes of violence as a result of the religious and cultural tenets of Islam are not being publicly acknowledged, they are not being statistically identified. Consequently, the adverse impact by the adherents to fundamentalist Islam on our society and to our culture is not being routinely addressed. Further, the threats to non-Muslims as “collateral damage” in Muslim honor killings, as clearly illustrated in the Almaleki case, are not being properly disclosed.

Moreover, violent domestic crime that is directly related to the Islamic culture that continues to be imported into the U.S. is easily downplayed in the absence of any reliable justice department statistics showing otherwise. Not only is this practice deceptive by design, it has the potential to create more victims like Ms. Almaleki. Left unchanged, it will.

One of the more recent, high-profile cases where the lack of crime statistics played a role is that of Rifqa Bary, a 17 year-old girl who fled from her Ohio home to Florida due to her alleged fear of falling victim to the ultimate punishment under Sharia law at the hands of her family. During a lengthy, frequently convoluted and often emotional process of court hearings and legal maneuvers, it was ultimately ruled that the minor Rifqa must be returned to the custody of her parents.

As an investigator with substantial field and courtroom experience, I followed that case closely, and it is indeed my professional opinion that there is a legitimate threat to the life of Rifqa Bary. Although I believe that there was a failure of the judiciary to give adequate weight to the testimony of lay witnesses, I do not believe that the judge should shoulder all of the blame in this case. I make that statement with complete knowledge of its potential unpopularity, but base it on an evaluation of direct, non-anecdotal evidence accessible to the supporters of Rifqa.

Bloggers in support of Rifqa were emotionally charged and contributed to an almost circus-like atmosphere outside of the courtroom at the Florida hearings. They can hardly be blamed for their emotional reactions to a system that relies more on bureaucratic agencies that have been infiltrated and co-opted by Islamic interests disguised as “PC speak” than reality. This is the same “politically correct” system that is presently being forced upon every mind-numb American by the so-called progressives to the ultimate peril of our freedoms, our culture and ultimately our nation.

In the case of Rifka Bary, wars of words erupted and degraded into shouting matches between shills for Muslim advocacy groups and Rifka’s supporters while an ambivalent and bemused media watched. Many valid points in support of Ms. Bary’s petition were made, but the bureaucratic machinery that most often holds the most weight in such legal machinations, although functionally incompetent, prevailed.

Perhaps if the team of well-intentioned proponents of Rifqa Bary were able to cite currently non-existent crime report statistics illustrating the existence of a clear and present threat, combined with other direct evidence, the case might have turned out differently. Instead, the emotional outcries overshadowed any possibility of delivering even the slightest bit of coherency which, of course, is exactly what the media reported. The legal system, hobbled by the strong lobby of progressives – Islam’s current bed partners – failed Rifqa.

To the peril of every non-Muslim in the West, specifically in the U.S. and Canada, our respective justice departments, law making and law enforcement agencies have been effectively neutered through infiltration or marginalized by operatives of refined, well orchestrated and heavily bankrolled Islamic advocacy groups. The most notable of these groups of course, is the Council on American and Islamic Relations (CAIR) and CAIR Canada, whose rabid pro-Islamist operatives have managed to gain positions or exert influence inside a variety of law enforcement agencies on all levels. Perhaps the most insidious infiltration of all, however, is within the U.S. Department of Justice.

As a result, all statistics involving Muslims, from hate crimes to honor killings have been deliberately and dishonestly skewed. Facing the possibility of protracted litigation from predatory lawsuits over religious discrimination and civil rights violations, as well as the unpopular political fallout such actions would create, top administration officials could not succumb fast enough to the metastatic growth of political correctness that is running a gauntlet for Islamic interests. Their acquiescence traded our individual and collective security for the illusion of fairness, and abandoned intellectual honesty to appease special interests.

It has never been more obvious than in the sad case of Noor Faleh Almaleki, who could effectively serve as “Exhibit A” for the “next” Rifqa Bary.

“Hate crimes” & “Honor Killings”

Every year since 1929, annual crime statistics have been compiled from the records of police departments across the United States. Those statistics comprise the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. Since 1930, the FBI has been publishing annual crime statistics in a comprehensive report known as Crime in the United States (CIUS). That report currently reflects statistics collected from 17,876 police departments across the U.S., according to the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Of the 17,876 departments, 13,241 law enforcement agencies participated in the UCR Program’s hate crime data collection in 2007. That same year, there were 7,624 incidents classified as “hate crimes” submitted by 2,025 agencies, according to 2007 Uniform Crime Report of Hate Crime Statistics.

Investigation and research by this author into the documentation that comprises hate crime statistics for 2007 (the figures for 2008 will be available through the FBI on November 23, 2009) found that the parameters used for “hate crimes” against Muslims are exceptionally broad and artificially inflated as a result. These expanded parameters are, in many cases, the direct result of CAIR officials demanding certain dubious questionable events to be included in anti-Muslim hate crime statistics. Examples are plentiful, and include unverified reports of minimal, if not insignificant property damage at mosques and Islamic centers. A trampled flower bed at a mosque, as one example, was listed as an anti-Islamic “hate crime” statistic.

In 2007, crimes classified as having their motivation in anti-Muslim bias amounted to about 9 percent of all hate crimes. By contrast, crimes against Jews, or those having an anti-Semitic motive amounted to nearly 70% during that same period. Despite those figures and the obvious disparity, there has been a continual and vociferous demand for special considerations within law enforcement on behalf of Muslims due to the deceitful embellishment of post-9/11 anti-Islamic bias. Although the statistics for 2008 are not yet published, a review of available reports indicates that the anti-Islamic motivated crimes have dropped significantly. Nonetheless, claims of anti-Islamic bias have risen exponentially during that same period.

Meanwhile, statistics of crimes by Muslims against Muslims, specifically those involving domestic violence, from Sharia sanctioned spousal abuse to “honor killings” are not maintained. The omission of this statistical classification is not due to its rarity, but by deliberate omission. Although the raw statistics exist within the comprehensive CIUS report, they are not properly categorized within the UCR Program’s hate crime data collection. Therefore, they remain a statistic that does not officially exist, except for the victims of such crimes.

To obtain a better perspective regarding honor killing, consider that the results of an epidemiological study recently published in the European Journal of Public Health identified that one in every five homicides in Pakistan is an “honor killing.” Even as alarming as that number might be, that figure is considered to be much lower than the actual number due to cultural and reporting factors, according to the author of the study.

Unsurprisingly, statistics regarding honor killings and other forms of domestic violence among Muslims from over half of the Muslim nations researched found numbers to be consistent with those of Pakistan or higher. In those cultures, women are not only unequal to men, but husbands may beat their wives in Sharia compliant venues. At its most extreme, honor killings are accepted and sanctioned under Sharia law. Considering the number of Muslims who have moved to the U.S. and Canada who remain adherent to the tenets of Sharia law, it would be unreasonable and intellectually dishonest not to address this issue.

One should not expect officials of CAIR or CAIR Canada, including those who are involved in shaping policy at justice department levels, to endorse the compilation of statistics regarding domestic crimes in Muslim families in the U.S. or Canada. Despite their self-described depiction as an advocate of Islamic civil rights and contrary to their public position, some CAIR officials and leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood associated with CAIR have endorsed all of the aspects of Sharia law, including those that accept or tacitly approve of Sharia justice. Do not let CAIR, the media, or any government agency or official tell you otherwise.

If we continue on this same path, there will be many more victims like Noor Faleh Almaleki, and more court rulings placing young women in peril like the case of Rifqa Bary. Changing direction will require changing policy. And policy change can only happen when those who have the power to make such changes accept the facts about Islam not only as a religion, but as a culture and political process – and have the courage to stand up and speak out.

Otherwise, the statistics that scream out for disclosure will be drowned out only by the screams of cultural Islam’s next victims.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in photos | 3 Comments »

None dare call it TREASON

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

- Northeast Intelligence Network – http://homelandsecurityus.com -

None dare call it TREASON
Posted By Sean Osborne On September 24, 2009 @ 10:48 am In Editorials, Ideological Jihad, Intelligence Analysis, International Terror, Sean Osborne | Comments Disabled

By Sean Osborne, Associate Director, Military Affairs Specialist

24 September 2009: Islam and its non-apostate adherents declared war against anything and everything non-Islamic at its inception in the Arabian heartland in 610 AD, fourteen centuries ago. Islam has always been a theology of hate, violence, wanton bloodshed and war. Islam is an equal opportunity hater because its violence is not only directed against those it considers infidels (kafirs) but those who are fellow Muslims. This is plainly evident in every nation on planet earth where Islam asserted itself through military conquest or remains as the dominant force over the past fourteen centuries. This fact is evident within Islam’s colonies in unconquered nations such as these United States. In no nation on planet earth is Islam a dominant force where violence, wanton bloodshed or wars were not the sole method of achieving that dominance.

It was in the face of these unassailable truths that the President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama declared just a few short months ago in the Egyptian and Turkish capitals, “America is not and never will be at war with Islam.” Have you ever heard a more treasonous statement since September 11, 2001?
Earlier this month President Barack Hussein Obama hosted the now-traditional Iftar feast celebrating the end of what he referred to as the “holy season” of Ramadan.

Raising up a quote from boxing legend Muhammad Ali before all of the Muslim ummah and non-Muslim infidels (kafirs) in attendance, President Barack Hussein Obama gave his seal of approval, indeed his personal view of why Islam is “truth:” “A few years ago he explained this view, and this is part of why he’s The Greatest, saying, ‘Rivers, ponds, lakes and streams, they all have different names, but they all contain water. Just as religions do, they all contain truths.’”

Was it any accident that one of the Muslims invited by the White House to attend the Iftar feast was Muslim convert Dr. Ingrid Mattson, president of the terrorist Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)? ISNA is one of nearly 300 unindicted co-conspirator terrorists identified by federal prosecutors in the U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial. On November 24, 2008, after seven days of deliberation and six weeks of testimony, a jury convicted the HLF and five of its leaders on all counts of providing material support to the Islamic terrorists of HAMAS (?arakat al-Muq?wamat al-Isl?miyyah, or “Islamic Resistance Movement”). As has been stated many, many times before, ISNA, CAIR and a host of other Islamic organizations are nothing more than fronts or associates of the al-Ikhwan al-Muslimuun, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), which itself is nothing more than a front for the Islamic terrorists of HAMAS. Of course this was no accident; these enemies of the United States of America and our Constitutional Republic are President Obama’s friends. Invite one and you have effectively invited them all to the Iftar feast. None dare call this treason?

So, with this emanating from the top of the American chain of command during a time of war should there be any doubt about why other unconscionable things are occurring on a daily basis these days?

Is there any doubt about why this president has continually stabbed our principle Middle Eastern ally in Israel squarely in the back at every opportunity?

How many eyebrows or voices rise in righteous indignation when President Barack Hussein Obama and his Secretary of State Hillary Clinton allow the dispatching of representatives of CAIR on overseas diplomatic missions to the Islamic Republic of Iran as representatives of the interests of the United States in return for CAIR intelligence briefings to them upon their return? Is this not absolutely insane in the face of the FBI’s finding that CAIR is a front organization for the terrorists of HAMAS?

Are the American people aware of the fact that while President Barack Hussein Obama speaks grandiose words on how we and our allies need to stick together and work closely in the fight in Afghanistan against the perpetrators of September 11, 2001, he then makes deals with our Russian enemy and pulls the plug on a missile defense system to be deployed on the territory of these same allies.

Yes, the missile defense system was to be deployed on the territory of Poland and the Czech Republic. Its purpose was to defend both the American homeland, as well as our allies, from the potential of nuclear missile attacks launched by Iran. Poland and the Czech Republic have been steadfast allies of America in this war, contributing troops, treasury and blood to the fight against Islam. And how does President Barack Hussein Obama repay our allies for their assistance? He denies them the presence of American troops on their soil who would operate these systems. Is it any wonder then that Poland is the first to respond to this back-stabbing by announcing they will not deploy a large contingent of their soldiers to Afghanistan? I do not for one second blame the Polish government for taking such a decision, particularly in light of the unambiguous statement made by the commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, that the failure to deploy more soldiers into the theater of combat operations will result in an all-but-certain condition of “mission failure.” Let that sink in. The American commander telling his commander in chief that failure to surge more troops into the war will result in mission failure in Afghanistan, the origin of the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Who are President Barack Hussein Obama’s friends? Who does he stand with in this war? On page 261 of his book “The Audacity of Hope” our elected President provides us with a precise answer to these questions: “I will stand with them [the Muslims] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” Wars are declared by politicians. Obama is a politician. Now that you’ve read his words, pay closer attention to his actions. They are not in our best interests. His intent is to allow America and our sons and daughters in harm’s way to simply bleed to death.

And none dare call this treason.

Article printed from Northeast Intelligence Network: http://homelandsecurityus.com

URL to article: http://homelandsecurityus.com/?p=3085

Click here to print.

Copyright (c) 2009 Northeast Intelligence Network. All rights reserved.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in photos | 1 Comment »